A small step back on this statement was Chris Anderson in Wired burying the web "to wish long life to the Internet." This statement was debate and it was a treat because it touched digital DNA that is in my opinion interactivity.
To summarize, Chris Anderson is based on the typical day of a geek who runs on the internet but not on the web, that is to say from one device to interaction to another depending on the contexts of use that meeting. "The screen that comes to me and not me who comes to the screen" The device web browser disappearing in favor of other forms of interface. "This statement is evident today, although that sufficiently democratized in use (in any case in France).
Then Chris Anderson supports his speech on the volume percentage of the different formats of content distributed on the internet showing that web content is clearly lower proportion than others. And that's where the controversy swelled up like anything Web continues to grow in parallel.
And after? This statement and the debate that ensued in the sphere of digital enthusiasts less take note of a small death of the web to emphasize that the metamorphosis of the Internet where it should move the scope of analysis, not on content, technology and formats but on the use and interactivity of the new framework resulting ...
The web is dead in the sense that it is no longer the exclusive interface interactivity. The Internet is taking over all forms of interactivity according to the contexts of use and usage.
The web is a way to use the internet. We entered the era Ubimedia. one adds in terms of usage of the Internet sites where content is king (content + browser ubiquity), internet web 2.0 where the conversation is king (+ widgetize social ubiquity), to open at the Internet IRL (including the mobile Internet is the first step), what I call 'Internet Usage friendly "(ubiquity of interactivity). So I m relies on paradigm of the Internet Context Friendly delivering customized services and conducive to the situation through what might be called a cloud servicial, and featuring all forms of interactivity to the appropriate contexts of use.
And Internet Usage friendly considers the context within 4 corners :
1. ability to adopt a mode of interactivity (devices) adapted to the context (where I am): continuity of screens; "is the screen that comes to me and I no longer come to screen. The screen is protean, interactivity is played multifaceted: it can be embodied in an ecosystem of smart objects, machinery, sensors, actuators, or in space (hyperlink) and well on media in user-medium ...
2. ability to deliver a service or content contextualized in real time: hyperlocal issues, marketing and the situ-commerce and LBS, terms of coverage networks.
3. to provide a service or content remotely: the traditional web, social and real-time (1.0 and 2.0), accessible from anywhere in connection continues
4. and all this hyper-personalized manner.
ps: I know, I ended up repeating myself but it's stronger than me ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment